(no subject)
Nov. 5th, 2009 11:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, the question you weren't supposed to ask. Have I ever taken an independent liking to any form of music without A MAN being involved?
The evidence is stacking up on one side of the balance.
I'm listening to the Feelies right now, simply because David Quantick said to on Twitter.
Maybe this is something I "should" have been listening to a long time ago. But when you get grey hairs and a lady-beard like mine, you're too old to worry about that kind of mocking, and the people you know are too old to dish it out.
Ever notice how I'm always free and easy on Twitter, and always prickly and self-undermining on here? There must be a reason for that.
The evidence is stacking up on one side of the balance.
I'm listening to the Feelies right now, simply because David Quantick said to on Twitter.
Maybe this is something I "should" have been listening to a long time ago. But when you get grey hairs and a lady-beard like mine, you're too old to worry about that kind of mocking, and the people you know are too old to dish it out.
Ever notice how I'm always free and easy on Twitter, and always prickly and self-undermining on here? There must be a reason for that.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 12:33 pm (UTC)Twitter > Facebook > Livejournal?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 01:28 pm (UTC)I think that because Twitter is perceived as the most trivial, it is lower risk than LJ (I don't do much with FB). What I say in 140 characters isn't supposed to be "good enough" so it can just sit there as it is, easy come, easy go. I don't need to make it clipped, frosty and defensive; neither do I need to pre-emptively undermine it as I tend to with anything longer than a sentence or five.
As I said elsewhere it is hard work and it continues to be hard work.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-05 04:55 pm (UTC)There, hope that's broken the pattern.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:33 pm (UTC)So I don't have to worry about being a woman who situates herself as "recipient," "learner," "vessel," "vassal," and "padawan," in relation to men; I just have to worry about situating as same in general.
Glad to have de-gendered my uselessness.
Cuppatea, anyone?